Research Articles | Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics

Assessment of aerodynamic response of the Nissibi cable-stayed bridge using three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics

Savaş Erdem, İrem Yağmuroğlu, Khalid Saifullah


DOI: https://doi.org/10.20528/cjsmec.2016.12.037
View Counter: Abstract | 1459 times |, Full Article | 303 times |

Abstract


Aerodynamic behavior has the greatest impact on long-span bridges and is the most important factor in the design of cable stayed bridges, which should not be overlooked. CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) is the most widely used technique, among bridge engineers, to predict wind speed, direction and vortex-shedding form before conducting wind tunnel tests. In this study, a bi-directional CFD analysis with the wind flow parallel and perpendicular to Nissibi Bridge's, which has a main span of 400 m and claimed the spot of Turkey’s 3rd largest bridge, deck cross-section has been performed by approximate modelling of the bridge and the surrounding structures. The study is done by using CFD++ software/computer program. The results showed that the effect of wind acting on x direction of impact with 30 m/s has caused turbulence and vortex on conjugation area of the tower and it is observed that the upside down Y shape of the tower breaks down the balance of wind flow. However, bridge deck is not exposed to serious amount of vortex influence due to the wind on y direction. In addition, the analysis revealed that maximum pressure distribution occurred on vertical surface of the tower and it increases in direct proportion to the height of the tower.


Keywords


aerodynamic behaviour; CFD; cable-stayed bridge; wind

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arioli G, Gazzola F (2013). Old and new explanations of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge collapse. Atti XXI Congresso AIMETA, Torino, p. 10.

Bai Y, Sun D, Lin J (2010). Three dimensional numerical simulations of long-span bridge aerodynamics, using block-iterative coupling and DES. Computers and Fluids, 39, 1549-1561.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2010.05.005

Bruno L, Khris S (2003). The validity of 2D numerical simulations of vortical structures around a bridge deck. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 37, 795-828.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7177(03)00087-6

Diana G, Fiammenghi G, Belloli M, Rocchi D (2013). Wind tunnel tests and numerical approach for long span bridges: The Messina Bridge. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 122, 38-49.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.07.012

Diana G, Yamasaki Y, Larsen A, Rocchi D, Giappino S, Argentini T, Pagani A, Villani M, Somaschini C, Portentoso M (2013). Construction stages of the long span suspension Izmit Bay Bridge: Wind tunnel test assessment. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 123, Part B, 300-310.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.09.006

Ge YJ, Tanaka H (2000). Aerodynamic flutter analysis of cable-supported bridges by multi-mode and full-mode approaches. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 86(2–3), 123-153.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(00)00007-6

Matsumoto M, Yagi T, Shigemura Y, Tsushima D (2001). Vortex-induced cable vibration of cable-stayed bridges at high reduced wind velocity. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 89, 633-647.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(01)00063-0

Park G, Hewson N (2008) (Eds.). ICE Manual of Bridge Engineering (2nd ed.). Thomas Telford.

Ren W, Peng X, Lin Y (2005). Experimental and analytical studies on dynamic characteristics of a large span cable-stayed bridge. Engineering Structures, 27, 535-548.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.11.013

Xu YL, Zhang N, Xia H (2004). Vibration of coupled train and cable-stayed bridge systems in cross winds. Engineering Structures, 26, 1389-1406.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.05.005

Yongle L, Liao H, Qiang S (2004). Simplifying the simulation of stochastic wind velocity fields for long cable-stayed bridges. Computers and Structures, 82, 1591-1598.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.05.007


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.