Performance evaluation of compressive strength of concrete using different machine learning algorithms
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20528/cjcrl.2025.02.002
View Counter: Abstract | 338 times | ‒ Full Article | 162 times |
Full Text:
PDFAbstract
Accurately predicting the compressive strength of concrete is crucial for ensuring structural integrity, optimizing material usage, and reducing construction costs. Conventional experimental methods, though reliable, are often labour-intensive and time-consuming. To address these limitations, this study investigates the effectiveness of machine learning (ML) algorithms as efficient alternatives for predicting concrete compressive strength. Four ML algorithms—Linear Regression (LR), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), M5 Rule-Based Model, and Support Vector Machines (SVM)—were evaluated based on their predictive performance. A comprehensive dataset comprising 350 concrete samples was prepared, with compressive strength tests conducted in accordance with Indian standard 516. The models were trained on experimental data and were tested using varying data splits of 50%, 40%, 30%, 20%, and 10% to assess their prediction accuracy. Among the evaluated models, the MLP demonstrated superior performance, achieving a correlation coefficient (CC) of 0.98 with a 20% testing split, outperforming the other algorithms. To further validate the predictive capability of the MLP model, multiple linear regression analysis was employed, confirming its robustness and generalization ability. The findings underscore the potential of machine learning techniques, particularly the MLP model, in providing accurate, reliable, and time-efficient predictions of concrete compressive strength. This study contributes to the growing body of research focused on leveraging machine learning for enhanced decision-making in construction material design, ultimately promoting more sustainable and cost-effective construction practices.
Keywords
References
Aydın Y, Ahadian F, Bekdaş G, Nigdeli S (2024). Prediction of optimum design of welded beam design via machine learning. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 10(3), 86-94.
Chou JS, Tsai CF (2012). Concrete compressive strength analysis using a combined classification and regression technique. Automation in Construction, 24, 52–60.
Ghoniem AG, Nour LAA (2025). Mechanical properties prediction of sandstone concrete with varying compaction levels and silica fume ratios using machine learning approaches. Construction and Building Materials, 460, 139817.
Gürbüz M, Kazaz İ (2024). Ultimate drift ratio prediction of steel plate shear wall systems: a machine learning approach. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 10(2), 34-46.
Harirchian E (2024). Predicting compressive strength of AAC blocks through machine learning advancements. Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters, 15(2), 56-68.
Huang X, Huang J, Kaewunruen S (2025). An explainable machine learning system for efficient use of waste glasses in durable concrete to maximize carbon credits towards net zero emissions. Waste Management, 193, 539–550.
IS 10262 (2019) Concrete Mix Proportioning – Guidelines (Second Revision). Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
Khan MS, Peng T, Khan MA, Khan A, Ahmad M, Aziz K, Sabri MMS, Abd El-Gawaad NS (2025). Explainable AutoML models for predicting the strength of high-performance concrete using Optuna, SHAP and ensemble learning. Frontiers in Materials, 12, 1542655.
Li SZ, Wang JJ, Jiang L, Deng R, Wang YH (2025). Machine learning-based strength prediction for circular concrete-filled double-skin steel tubular columns under axial compression. Engineering Structures, 325, 119460.
Nalina M (2023). Efficacies of suggested strength-based prediction models for estimation of compressive and tensile properties of normal concrete. Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters, 14(2), 47-58.
Oyebisi S, Shammas MI, Sani R, Oyewola MO, Olutoge F (2024). Artificial intelligence-based modeling of compressive strength of slurry-infiltrated fiber concrete. World Journal of Engineering, ahead-of-print.
Öztaş A, Pala M, Özbay E, Kanca E, Çağlar N, Bhatti MA (2005). Predicting the compressive strength and slump of high strength concrete using neural network. Construction and Building Materials, 20(9), 769–775.
Pan B, Liu W, Zhou P, Wu DO (2025). Predicting the compressive strength of recycled concrete using ensemble learning model. IEEE Access, 13, 2958-2969.
Quinlan JR (1992). Learning with continuous classes. Proceedings of the 5th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 343–348.
Salami BA, Usman J, Gbadamosi A, Malami SI, Abba SI (2024). Global big data laboratory experiment integrated with kernel-based algorithms for compressive strength modeling. Scientific Reports, 14, 30646.
Smola AJ, Schölkopf B (2004). A tutorial on support vector regression. Statistics and Computing, 14(3), 199–222.
Tiep NH, Jeong HY, Kim KD, Mung NX, Dao NN, et al. (2024). A new hyperparameter tuning framework for regression tasks in deep neural networks. Mathematics, 12(24), 3892.
Topçu IB, Sarıdemir M (2008). Prediction of compressive strength of concrete containing fly ash using artificial neural networks and fuzzy logic. Computational Materials Science, 41(3), 305–311.
Ullah I, Javed MF, Alabduljabbar H, Ullah H (2025). Estimating the compressive and tensile strength of basalt fiber-reinforced concrete using advanced hybrid machine learning models. Structures, 71, 108138.
Vapnik VN (1995). The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer.
Witten IH, Frank E (2005). Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Yeh IC (1998). Modeling of strength of high-performance concrete using artificial neural networks. Cement and Concrete Research, 28(12), 1797–1808.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.