Email this article Influence of the distance between vertical cylinders positioned in a row on the wind load on them
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20528/cjsmec.2024.03.003
View Counter: Abstract | 26 times | ‒ Full Article | 6 times |
Full Text:
PDFAbstract
The silos and vertical cylindrical tanks of small volumes are often built in batteries, at short distances between them. As a result of their close location, the wind load on them increases. In the European standard EN 1991-1-4:2005+A1:2010 exists a methodology for determining this increase, which is dependent on the ratio a/d, where a is the distance between the facilities and d is their diameters. Unfortunately, this methodology is applicable for ratios a/d > 2.5. In cases where the values are smaller, the standard transfers to the national annexes. In the available to the author annexes, including the Bulgarian one, there is nothing on the subject. Moreover, the necessary information could not be found in the public scientific literature. Only in the Australian/New Zealand standard AS/NZS 1170.2:2011 are written some simple rules for closely spaced vessels. To fill this gap, multiple models of closely spaced cylindrical bodies has been created by the author. A computer fluid simulation (CFD) program is used for this purpose. In the present study, the bodies are arranged in one row and the wind blows them perpendicularly. Through these computer models is determined how the wind load changes due to their proximity. In contrast to what is stated in EN 1991-1-4:2005+A1:2010, the dependence is not linear, and the influence of the close arrangement of the bodies decays much faster. On the other hand, this influence should be considered at much greater distances between bodies than stated in AS/NZS 1170.2:2011.
Keywords
References
Agyropulos C, Markatos N (2015). Recent advances on the numerical modelling of turbulent flows. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 39, 693–732.
ANSYS® v.2024 R1 (2024). Documentation. Ansys Inc., Canonsburg, PA, the USA.
AS/NZS 1170.2 (2011). Structural Design Actions. Part 2: Wind actions. Standards Australia Limited / Standards New Zealand. ISBN 978-0-7337-9805-4.
Baklanov A, Barmpas P, Bartzis J, Batchvarova E, et al. (2007). Best Practice Guideline for the CFD Simulation of Flows in the Urban Environment. edited by Franke J, Hellsten A, Schlunzen H and Carissmo B. COST Action 732, Brussels, Belgium. ISBN: 3-00-018312-4.
BDS EN 1991-1-4:2005/NA (2011). Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-4: General actions – Wind actions. National annex to BDS EN 1991-1-4:2005. Bulgarian Institute for Standardization, Sofia.
DS/EN 1991-1-4 DK NA (2015). Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-4: General actions – Wind actions. National annex to DS/EN 1991-1-4. Danish Standards Foundation, København.
EN 1991-1-4 (2005). Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-4: General actions – Wind actions. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
EN 1991-1-4:2005+A1 (2010). Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-4: General actions – Wind actions. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
Hillewaere J, Degroote J, Rezayat A, Vanlanduit S, Lombaert G, Vierendeels J, Degrande G (2013). Numerical investigation of wind induced ovalling vibrations in silo groups. 4th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Greece.
Hillewaere J, Degroote J, Lombaert G, Vierendeels J, Degrande G (2015). Wind-structure interaction simulations of ovalling vibrations in silo groups. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 59, 328-350.
Launder B, Sharma B (1974). Application of the energy dissipation model of turbulence to the calculation of flow near a spinning disk. Letters in Heat and Mass Transfer, 1, 131-138.
Macdonald P, Holmes J, Kwok K (1990). Wind loads on circular storage bins, silos and tanks. II. Effect of grouping. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 34, 77-95.
Markatos N (1986). The mathematical modelling of turbulent flows. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 10(3), 190-220.
NA to SS EN 1991-1-4 (2009). Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-4: General actions – Wind actions. National annex to SS EN 1991-1-4:2009. Standards Council of Singapore, Singapore.
Pantusheva M, Mitkov R, Hristov PO, Petrova-Antonova D (2022). Air pollution dispersion modelling in urban environment using CFD: A systematic review. Atmosphere, 13, 1640.
Rusev I, Tanev T, Dinev D (2012a). Numerical study of wind actions on tall buildings with ANSYS CFX and comparison with EN1991-1-4. Proceedings of XII International Scientific Conference VSU’2012, Sofia, vol. 1, pp. 83-88. (in Bulgarian)
Rusev I, Dinev D, Tanev T (2012b). Numerical study of wind actions on nearby tall buildings. Proceedings of International Jubilee Scientific Conference UACEG’2012, Sofia, pp. 15-17. (in Bulgarian)
Tominaga Y, Mochida A, Yoshie R, Kataoka H, Nozu T, Yoshikawa M, Shirasawa T (2008). AIJ guidelines for practical applications of CFD to pedestrian wind environment around buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 96(10-11), 1749-1761.
Yu M, Liao H, Li M, Ma C, Luo N, Liu M (2011). Study on static wind loading coefficients of suspension bridge, based on CFD simulation and wind tunnel test. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 66-68, 334-339.
Zdravkov L (2022). Wind loads on girder bridges. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 8(1), 9-16.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
