Research Articles | Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics

Size effect on compressive behavior of GFRP bars

Meltem Eryılmaz Yıldırım, Kerem Aybar, Mehmet Canbaz
Meltem Eryılmaz Yıldırım iD * Department of Civil Engineering, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, 26480 Eskişehir, Türkiye
Kerem Aybar iD Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, 26480 Eskişehir, Türkiye
Mehmet Canbaz iD Department of Civil Engineering, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, 26480 Eskişehir, Türkiye
View Counter: Abstract | 818 times | ‒ Full Article | 445 times |
Citation Metadata Academic search Print Email (Login required) Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Contact author (Login required)

Full Text

View PDF

Abstract


In the last three decades, studies investigating the use of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) bars as an alternative to conventional steel rebars have increased due to their corrosive resistance. In addition to corrosion resistance, GFRP bars utilize high specific tensile strength, which makes them highly desirable in civil engineering applications. However, major design guidelines for GFRP-reinforced concrete structures currently do not consider their compressive contribution. Nevertheless, there is a growing trend in utilizing GFRP bars as compressive elements, driven by various studies demonstrating their ability to bear compressive loads effectively. This increasing demand underscores the need to comprehend the mechanical properties of GFRP bars, particularly in terms of their compressive behavior. Furthermore, a standardized test method to evaluate their compressive properties has not yet been developed. Addressing these gaps, this research paper focuses on investigating the influence of specimen size on the compressive strength of GFRP bars, specifically emphasizing on the compressive properties of GFRP bars. Compressive tests were conducted on GFRP specimens with varying diameters while maintaining a constant slenderness ratio. The findings from these compression tests shed light on the critical role of size in the compressive behavior of GFRP. This research emphasizes the importance of considering size as a significant parameter in designing mechanical properties for GFRP reinforcements.


Keywords


GFRP bars; compressive strength; compression test; mechanical properties

References


Abed F, Mehaini Z, Oucif C, Abdul–Latif A, Baleh R (2020). Quasi-static and dynamic response of GFRP and BFRP bars under compression. Composites Part C, Open Access 2, 100034.

AlAjarmeh OS, Manalo AC, Benmokrane B, Vijay PV, Ferdous W, Mendis P (2019). Novel testing and characterization of GFRP bars in compression. Construction and Building Materials, 225, 1112–1126.

AlNajmi L, Abed F (2020). Evaluation of FRP bars under compression and their performance in RC columns. Materials, 13, 4541.

Al-Salloum YA, El-Gamal S, Almusallam TH, Alsayed SH, Aqel M (2013). Effect of harsh environmental conditions on the tensile properties of GFRP bars. Composites Part B: Engineering, 45, 835–844.

ASTM D695 (2015). Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties of Rigid Plastics. ASTM International. West Conshohocken, PA, USA.

Balendran RV, Rana TM, Maqsood T, Tang WC (2002). Application of FRP bars as reinforcement in civil engineering structures. Structural Survey, 20, 62–72.

Benmokrane B, Chaallal O, Masmoudi R (1995). Glass fibre reinforced plastic (GFRP) rebars for concrete structures. Construction and Building Materials, 353–364.

Berbinau P, Soutis C, Guz LA, Timoshenko LZP (1999). On the failure criteria for unidirectional carbon fibre composite materials under compression. International Applied Mechanics, 35, 462.

Bruun E (2014). GFRP bars in structural design: Determining the compressive strength versus unbraced length interaction curve. Canadian Young Scientist Journal, 2014, 22–29.

D’Antino T, Pisani MA (2023). Tensile and compressive behavior of thermoset and thermoplastic GFRP bars. Construction and Building Materials, 366, 130104.

Deitz DH, Harik IE, Gesund H (2003). Physical properties of glass fiber reinforced polymer rebars in compression. Journal of Composites for Construction, 7, 363–366.

Galati N, Vollintine B, Nanni A, Dharani LR, Aiello MA (2004). Thermal effects on bond between FRP rebars and concrete. Advanced Polymer Composites for Structural Applications in Construction, 501–508.

González C, LLorca J (2007). Mechanical behavior of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymers under transverse compression: Microscopic mechanisms and modeling. Composites Science and Technology, 67, 2795–2806.

Khan QS, Sheikh MN, Hadi MNS (2015). Tension and compression testing of fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) bars. The 12th International Symposium on Fiber Reinforced Polymers for Reinforced Concrete Structures (FRPRCS-12) & The 5th Asia-Pacific Conference on Fiber Reinforced Polymers in Structures (APFIS-2015). Nanjing, China.

Khorramian K, Sadeghian P (2021). Material characterization of GFRP bars in compression using a new test method. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 49, 20180873.

Kobayashi K, Fujisaki T (1995). Compressive behavior of FRP reinforcement in non-prestressed concrete members. In: Taerwe L, editor. Non-metallic (FRP) Reinforcement for Concrete Structures, 1st ed., Taylor & Francis Group, 267–274.

Lagoudas DC, Saleh AM (1993). Geometry and loading effects on the compressive strength of fibrous composites. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 12, 1016–1023.

Micelli F, Nanni A (2001). Mechanical properties and durability of FRP rods. CIES Report 00-22. Rolla, MO: Taylor & Francis. http://www.crcnetbase.com/doi/10.1201/9780203883440.ch65.

Nanni A (1993). Fiber-reinforced-plastic (FRP) reinforcement for concrete structures. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Elsevier.

Özkal FM, Polat M, Yağan M, Öztürk MO (2018). Mechanical properties and bond strength degradation of GFRP and steel rebars at elevated temperatures. Construction and Building Materials, 184, 45–57.

Saadatmanesh H, Ehsani MR (1991). Fiber composite bar for reinforced concrete construction. Journal of Composite Materials, 25, 188–203.

Schultheisz CR, Waas AM (1996). Compressive failure of composites, part I: Testing and micromechanical theories. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 32(1), 1–42.

Soutis C, Lee J, Kong C (2002). Size effect on compressive strength of T300/924C carbon fibre-epoxy laminates. Plastics, Rubber and Composites, 31, 364–370.

Thiyagarajan P, Pavalan V, Sivagamasundari R (2018). Mechanical characterization of basalt fibre reinforced polymer bars for reinforced concrete structures. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 13, 5858–5862.

Wiater A, Siwowski T (2020). Comparison of tensile properties of glass fibre reinforced polymer rebars by testing according to various standards. Materials, 13, 4110.

Zhang X, Deng Z (2019). Durability of GFRP bars in the simulated marine environment and concrete environment under sustained compressive stress. Construction and Building Materials, 223, 299–309.

Zhou HW, Yi HY, Gui LL, Dai GM, Peng RD, Wang HW, Mishnaevsky L (2013). Compressive damage mechanism of GFRP composites under off-axis loading: Experimental and numerical investigations. Composites Part B: Engineering, 55, 119–127.

Zhou Z, Meng L, Zeng F, Guan S, Sun J, Tafsirojjaman T (2023). Experimental study and discrete analysis of compressive properties of glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars. Polymers (Basel), 15, 2651.


Related Articles

  • Memduh Karalar, Murat Demirköse, Necati Mert
    Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics (2024) 10(1) 7-13
    The Winkler method, which is widely used today, assumes that the soil behaves elastically and does not take into account the soil shear stress values, it is insufficient to reflect the actual soil behavior. Especially in the earthquake calculations of rigid an...
  • Süleyman Kamil Akın, Ahmet Alagöz
    Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics (2024) 10(1) 21-33
    Masonry structures is one of the most preferred structure types throughout history. The advantageous of these structures can be categorized as longevity, affordability and easy access to materials. Due to a lack of information and constructive errors, masonry ...
  • Serdal Ünal, Ahmet Burak Kurt, Mehmet Canbaz
    Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters (2025) 16(3) 133-141
    In this study, the effect of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) wrapping on the compressive and bending behavior of damaged reinforced concrete structural elements located in high earthquake risk areas was investigated in detail. The main objective was to ...
  • Serdal Ünal, Mehmet Canbaz
    Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters (2025) 16(1) 15-24
    In general, surface contamination of building materials is caused by pollution, which can be divided into human-made and natural sources. Building materials whose surfaces are exposed to pollutants from these sources for a long time show chemical and physical ...
  • Fatih Şamdan, İbrahim Çelikyürek, Mehmet Canbaz
    Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters (2024) 15(4) 112-119
    Waste baked clay is an industrial waste that causes environmental pollution. Therefore, the possible utilization of this material would reduce environmental pollution. Utilization of baked clay as aggregate in concrete would have a positive effect on the econo...