Research Articles | Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics

Effect of soil types on nonlinear earthquake behavior of buildings

Memduh Karalar, Murat Demirköse, Necati Mert


DOI: https://doi.org/10.20528/cjsmec.2024.01.002
View Counter: Abstract | 102 times |, Full Article | 36 times |

Abstract


The Winkler method, which is widely used today, assumes that the soil behaves elastically and does not take into account the soil shear stress values, it is insufficient to reflect the actual soil behavior. Especially in the earthquake calculations of rigid and massive structures such as high-rise buildings, dams, suspension bridges, viaducts, it is necessary to consider soil as a dynamic system that changes shape and affects the behavior of the structure in terms of inertia. In response to the effect of soil on the structure, the structure also affects soil both kinematically and dynamically. Thus, in the absence of the structure, the earthquake data, which is only a result of the dynamic behavior of the soil in its internal structure, now acquires a more complex soil motion characteristic that is also affected by the presence of the structure. The observations made in some earthquakes show that the changes between the records taken simultaneously on the building foundation and at soil surface not a point far from foundation, show that the structure also affects soil therefore soil motion in response to the effect of the earthquake on the structure. In this study, the effect of soil types on the nonlinear seismic behavior of reinforced concrete structures was investigated. For this purpose, 7-storey building models with different plans and rigidities were created. The behavior of these models under 11 different earthquake loads for the ZA, ZB, ZC, ZD, ZE soil types specified in the Turkish Building Earthquake Code has been investigated. Analyzes were made using the time history method with the help of the SAP2000 program. As a result of the analysis, the displacements, plastic hinge formation, Effective inter-storey drift and period values obtained for different models were compared.


Keywords


soil-structure interaction; time history method; 3D dynamic analysis; soil dominant period

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ala N (2007). Adapazarı Zemininde Yapılan Betonarme Yapılarda Zemin-Yapı Etkileşimi, M.Sc. thesis, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Türkiye. (in Turkish)

ASCE 7-10 (2010). Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. ASCE Standard, ASCE/SEI 7-10. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, USA.

Aviles J, and Perez-Rocha LE (1998). Effects of foundation embedment during building-soil interaction. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 27, 1523-1540.

Aydınoğlu MN (1977). Üstyapı-Zemin Ortak Sisteminin Deprem Hesabı. Ph.D. thesis, İstanbul Technical University, İstanbul, Türkiye. (in Turkish)

Aydınoğlu MN (1981). Yapı-Zemin Dinamik Etkileşiminin Genel formülasyonu ve Zemin Gömülü Yapılar için bir Alt Sistem Yöntemi. Associate Professorship thesis, İstanbul, Türkiye. (in Turkish)

Aydınoğlu MN (1994). Statik ve Dinamik Yapı-Zemin Etkileşimi., Zemin Mekaniği ve Temel Mühendisliği 5. Ulusal Kongresi, 218-229, METU, Ankara, Türkiye. (in Turkish)

Bettes P, Zienkiewicz OC (1969). Diffraction and refraction of surface waves using finite and infinite elements. International Journal of Numerical Engineering, 95(EM4), 859-877.

Bolisetti C, Whittaker AS, Coleman JL (2018). Linear and nonlinear soil-structure interaction analysis of buildings and safety-related nuclear structures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 107, 218-233.

Castelli F. Grasso S, Lentini V, Sammito MSV (2021). Effects of soil-foundation-interaction on the seismic response of a cooling tower by 3D-FEM analysis. Geosciences, 11, 200.

Chian SC, Wilkinson SM, Whittle JK, Mulyani R, Alarcon JE, Pomonis A, Saito K, Fraser S, Goda K, Macabuag J, Offord M, Hunt-Raby AC, Sammonds P, Franco G, Stone H, Ahmed B, Hughes FE, Jirouskova NK, Kaminski S, Lopez J (2019). Lessons learnt from the 2009 Padang Indonesia, 2011 Tōhoku Japan and 2016 Muisne Ecuador Earthquakes. Frontiers in Built Environment, 5 (73), 1-20.

Eurocode-8 (2004). Design Provisions for Earthquake Resistance of Structures. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.

Gazetas G (1991). Foundation Vibrations, Foundation Engineering Handbook. Van Nostrand Reinhold, 2nd edition, 553-593, New York, USA.

Gouasmia A, Djeghaba K (2007). Non-linear dynamic soil-structure interaction analysis of buildings. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 13(4), 266-271.

Guiterrez JA, Chopra AK (1978). A substructure method for structures and geotechnical aspects. Earthquake Engineering and Structure Dynamics, 6, 51- 69.

Ichihara Y, Nakamura N, Moritani H, Choi B, Nishida A (2021). 3D FEM soil-structure interaction analysis for Kashiwazaki–Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant considering soil separation and sliding. Frontiers in Built Environment, 7, 676408.

Iida M (1998). Three-dimensional non-linear soil–building interaction analysis in the lakebed zone of Mexico city during the hypothetical Guerrero earthquake. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 27, 1483-1502.

Kayhan AH, Korkmaz KA, Irfanoglu A (2011). Selecting and scaling real ground motion records using harmony search algorithm. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 31, 941–953.

Lysmer J, Kuhlemeyer RL (1969). Finite dynamic model for infinite media, Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 95(EM4), 859-877.

Medina F (1980). Modelling of soil-structure interaction by finite and infinite elements. Report No. UCB/EERC-80/43, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Oz I, Senel SM, Palanci M, Kalkan A (2020). Effect of soil-structure interaction on the seismic response of existing low and mid-rise rc buildings. Applied Sciences, 10, 8357.

Parmelee RA (1967). Building-foundation interaction effects. Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division, 93(EM2), 131-152.

PEER (2011). University of California, Berkeley. http://nisee.berkeley.edu/spl/ [accessed 01-04-2023]

Pişen S, Pekşen E (2009). Sığ zeminler için farklı yöntemlerden elde edilen zemin emniyet gerilmesi değerlerinin karşılaştırılması. Journal of Applied Earthsciences, 8(2), 36-46. (in Turkish)

TBDY-2018 (2018). Türkiye Bina Deprem Yönetmeliği. Afet ve Acil Durum Başkanlığı, Ankara, Türkiye, 30364.

Tezcan SS, Ozdemir Z, Keceli A (2006). Allowable bearing capacity of shallow foundations based on shear wave velocity. Journal of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 24, 203-218.

Vicencio F, Alexander NA (2018). Dynamic interaction between adjacent buildings through nonlinear soil during earthquakes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 10, 130-141.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.