Research Articles | Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics

Seismic performance evaluation of an existing school building in Turkey

Hüseyin Bilgin


DOI: https://doi.org/10.20528/cjsmec.2015.07.020
View Counter: Abstract | 1650 times | ‒ Full Article | 450 times |

Full Text:

PDF

Abstract


A great part of existing RC structures built in Turkey is that they have been designed without considering seismic-induced actions and seismic criteria for strength and ductility design. In this context, after the recent devastating earthquakes in Turkey, there has been a concerted effort to address the seismic vulnerability of existing public buildings in Turkey. The need for the evaluation and strengthening of these public buildings have come into focus following the enormous loss of lives and property during the past earthquakes. This study aims to assess the seismic performance evaluation of a typical school building in accordance with the rules of Turkish Earthquake Code-2007. The performance analysis is carried out by using nonlinear static analysis. The analytical solutions show that the intended performance level has not been satisfied for this building and decided to retrofit the structural system. The proposed procedure is applied to the retrofitted system and the obtained results are tabulated and discussed.


Keywords


public buildings; performance evaluation; pushover analysis; retrofit

References


ASCE/SEI 41-06 (2007). Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, USA.

ATC-40 (1996). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings. Volume 1-2, Seismic Safety Commission, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA, USA.

Bilgin H (2007). Seismic Performance Evaluation of Public Buildings Using Non-Linear Analysis Procedures and Solution Methods. Ph.D. thesis, Pamukkale University, Turkey.

Eurocode-8 (2005). Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance – Part 3: Assessment and Retrofitting of Buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.

FEMA-273 (1997). NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, USA.

FEMA-356 (2000). Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, USA.

FEMA-440 (2005). Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Procedures. American Society of Civil Engineers, Federal emergency management agency, Washington, USA.

Mander JB, Priestly MJN, Park R (1988). Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. ASCE Journal of Structural Division, 114(8), 1804-1826.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804)

Priestley MJN, Seible F, Calvi GMS (1996). Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470172858

SAP2000 (2003). Integrated Finite Element Analysis and Design of Structures. Computers and Structures Inc., Berkeley, California.

TBC-1984 (1984). Requirements for Design and Construction of Reinforced Concrete Structures. Ankara, Turkey.

TBC-500 (2000). Requirements for Design and Construction of Reinforced Concrete Structures. Ankara, Turkey.

TEC-1975 (1975). Regulations on Structures Constructed in Disaster Regions. Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Ankara, Turkey.

TEC-1998 (1998). Specifications for Structures to be built in Disaster Areas. Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Ankara, Turkey.

TEC-2007 (2007). Turkish Earthquake Code: Regulations on Structures Constructed in Disaster Regions. Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Ankara, Turkey.

TS-498 (1997). Design Loads for Buildings. Turkish Standard Institute, Ankara, Turkey.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.