Email this article Impact of wrap quantity on strength of damaged and undamaged CFRP-reinforced structural members
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20528/cjcrl.2025.03.003
View Counter: Abstract | 608 times | ‒ Full Article | 281 times |
Full Text:
PDFAbstract
In this study, the effect of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) wrapping on the compressive and bending behavior of damaged reinforced concrete structural elements located in high earthquake risk areas was investigated in detail. The main objective was to evaluate the potential of CFRP wraps as an effective strengthening technique for improving the mechanical performance of concrete members that have already sustained damage. During the experimental phase, concrete specimens in the form of 15×15×15 cm cubes and 10×10×50 cm prisms were prepared using CEM IV 32.5 pozzolanic cement, which is commonly used in structural applications due to its durability and environmental benefits. After subjecting these specimens to controlled damage to simulate real-life structural degradation, they were reinforced using single and double layers of CFRP wrapping. The mechanical performances of these wrapped specimens were then assessed through compressive and bending strength tests. The results demonstrated that CFRP wrapping significantly enhanced the compressive strength of the specimens, with double-layer applications showing the greatest improvements. However, the effect on flexural strength was found to be more limited, indicating that although CFRP is 60.83% effective in resisting compressive loads, its contribution to flexural capacity may require additional considerations. Furthermore, double-layer CFRP wrapping not only improved strength but also increased deformation capacity, indicating enhanced ductility and energy absorption. Despite the relatively high cost of CFRP materials, these findings highlight the technique as a practical and efficient solution for the rehabilitation and strengthening of compression load-bearing members, particularly in regions vulnerable to seismic activity.
Keywords
References
Alabdulhady MY, Ojaimi MF, Chkheiwer AH (2022). The efficiency of CFRP strengthening and repair system on the flexural behavior of RC beams constructed with different concrete compressive strength. Results in Engineering, 16, 100763.
Bird JF, Bommer JJ (2004). Earthquake losses due to ground failure. Engineering Geology, 75(2), 147-179.
Çelik Z, Turan E, Oltulu M, Öner G (2024). Reinforcement of concrete beams using waste carbon-nanoclay-fiberglass laminate pieces. Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters, 15(1), 1-6.
EN 12620 (2002). Aggregates for concrete. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels, Belgium.
Eryılmaz Yıldırım M, Aybar K, Canbaz M (2024). Size effect on compressive behavior of GFRP bars. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 10(1), 14-20.
Hegde S, Shenoy BS, Chethan, KN (2019). Review on carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) and their mechanical performance. Materials Today: Proceedings, 19, 658-662.
Heidarzadeh G (2022). Numerical Modelling of Bond Behaviour of FRP Bar Reinforced Concrete Beam Under High Strain Rate Impact Load. Ph.D. thesis, City St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Jagarajan R., Asmoni MNAM, Mohammed AH, Jaafar MN, Mei JLY, Baba M (2017). Green retrofitting–A review of current status, implementations and challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 67, 1360-1368.
Keshmiry A, Hassani S, Dackermann U, Li J (2024). Assessment, repair, and retrofitting of masonry structures: A comprehensive review. Construction and Building Materials, 442, 137380.
Kim, NI, Kwon DY, Burenkhangai D., Lee KM, Bae SY, Chu YS (2023). A study on manufacturing CFRP rebar with a high tensile strength. Journal of the Korean Ceramic Society, 60(3), 488-495.
Ma Z, Cooper P, Daly D, Ledo L (2012). Existing building retrofits: Methodology and state-of-the-art. Energy and Buildings, 55, 889-902.
Mitra P (2000). Advanced polymer composites with special reference to carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP). Proceedings of National Conference on Composites: Science & Technology, IIT Bombay, 31–48.
Mousa S, Mohamed HM, Benmokrane B (2019). Strength and deformability aspects of circular concrete members reinforced with hybrid carbon-FRP and glass-FRP under flexure. Journal of Composites for Construction, 23(2), 04019005.
Rashid SP, Bahrami A (2023). Structural performance of infilled steel–concrete composite thin-walled columns combined with FRP and CFRP: A comprehensive review. Materials, 16(4), 1564.
TS EN 197-1 (2012). Cement – Part 1: Composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements. Turkish Standards Institution, Ankara, Türkiye.
TS EN 1504-4 (2006). Products and systems for the protection and repair of concrete structures – Part 4: Structural bonding. Turkish Standards Institution, Ankara, Türkiye.
Wu J, He X, Li Y, Shi P, Ye T, Li N (2019). How earthquake-induced direct economic losses change with earthquake magnitude, asset value, residential building structural type and physical environment: An elasticity perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 231, 321-328.
Xue W., Tan Y, Zeng L (2010). Flexural response predictions of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with prestressed CFRP plates. Composite Structures, 92(3), 612-622.
Younis A, Ebead U, Judd S (2018). Life cycle cost analysis of structural concrete using seawater, recycled concrete aggregate, and GFRP reinforcement. Construction and Building Materials, 175, 152-160.
Zardari S, Kutlu İ, Nayeb A (2024). Investigation of structural performances of historical building elements made with local materials using the finite element method. Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters, 15(3), 101-111.
