Research Articles | Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters

Mechanical strength variation of zeolite-fly ash geopolymer mortars with different activator concentrations

Roble İbrahim Liban, Ülkü Sultan Keskin, Oğuzhan Öztürk


DOI: https://doi.org/10.20528/cjcrl.2021.03.003

Abstract


Zeolite is of a significance for geopolymers as it is a natural precursor and does not require additional heat treatment for activation. However, aluminosilicates sourced from natural sources require additional handling for the best use of exploitation. In this study, geopolymers were synthesized by binary use of zeolite and fly ash as main binding material and sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide as alkaline activator. The influence of alkaline activator ratios and sodium hydroxide concentrations on the compressive strength and flexural strength of the zeolite-fly ash based geopolymers were studied. In this research, zeolite-fly ash based geopolymer mortars were produced by using 50% of natural zeolite (clinoptilolite) and 50% of C-type fly ash. Four different activator ratios (Na2SiO3/NaOH: 1, 1.5, 2 and 2.5) and two sodium hydroxide molarities (10M and 12M) was utilized to activate zeolite and fly ash in order to determine the effect of these parameters on the mechanical strengths of the produced geopolymer mortars. The results indicated that as the alkaline activator ratio and NH molarity were increased the compressive strength of the zeolite-fly ash based geopolymers also increased. The maximum compressive and flexural strength values obtained after 28 days of curing were 20.1 MPa and 5.3 MPa respectively and corresponds when used activator ratio of 2.5 and sodium hydroxide concentration of 12 molarity. The obtained results indicated that both the alkaline activator ratio and sodium hydroxide concentration affected the compressive and flexural strengths of zeolite-fly ash based geopolymer mortar specimens.


Keywords


compressive strength; geopolymer; zeolite; fly ash; sodium hydroxide; sodium silicate

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alcantara E, Cheeseman Ch, Knight J, Loizidou M (2000). Properties of alkali activated clinoptilolite. Journal of Cement and Concrete Research, 30, 1641-1646.

Bakharev T (2005). Geopolymer materials prepared using class F fly ash and elevated temperature curing. Journal of Cement and Concrete Research, 35, 1224-1232.

Baykara H, Cornejo MH, Murillo R, Gavilanes, A, Paredes C, Elsen J (2017). Preparation, characterization and reaction kinetics of green cement: Ecua-dorian natural mordenite based geopolymers. Materials and Structures, 50, 188.

Davitovits J (1991). Geopolymers: inorganic polymeric new materials. Journal of Thermal Anal, 37, 1633-1656.

Duxson P, Mallicoat SW, Lukey GC, Kriven WM, van Deventer JSJ (2007). The effect of alkali and Si/Al ratio on the development of mechanical proper-ties of metakaolin-based geopolymers. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicodhem. Eng. Aspects, 292, 8-20.

Lilkov V, Petrov O, Petkova V, Petrova N, Tzveyanova Y (2011). Study of pozzolanic activity and hydration products of cement pastes with addition of natural zeolites. Journal of Clay Minerals, 46(2), 241-250.

Lithareva N, Dimova L, Petrov O, Tzvetanova Y (2010). Ag+ sorption on natural and Na-exchanged clinoptilolite from Eastern Rhodopes, Bulgaria. Journal of Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 130(1), 32-37.

Martinez-Ramirez S, Blanco-Varela MT, Erena I, Gener M (2011). Pozzolanic reactivity of zeolitic rocks from two different Cuban deposits: characteri-zation of reaction products. Journal of Applied Clay Science, 32, 40-52.

Nikolov I, Rostovsky I (2017). Sodium-silicate geopolymers based on natural zeolite-clinoptilolite. Comptes rendus de l’ A bulgare des sciences, 70, 1655-1662.

Nikolov A, Rostovsky I, Nugteren H (2017). Geopolymer materials based on natural zeolite, case study. Construction and Building Materials, 6, 198-205.

Sevgi O, Burhan A (2018). Compressive strength and microstructural characteristics of natural zeolite-based geopolymer. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 68, 64-71.

Soutsos M, Boyle AP, Vinai R, Barnett SJ (2016). Factors influencing the compressive strength of fly ash based geopolymers. Construction and Build-ing Materials, 110, 355-368.

Sudagar A, Andrejkovicova S, Patinha C, Velosa A, McAdam A, Ferreira da Silva E, Rocha F (2018). A novel study on the influence of cork waste residue on metakaolin-zeolite based geopolymers. Journal of Applied Clay Science, 152, 196-210.

Swanepoel JC, Strydom CA (2002). Utilization of fly ash in geopolymeric materials. Applied Geochemistry, 17, 1143-1148.

Tahir G, Salih Y, Nusret B (2010). High temperature resistance of self-compacting lightweight concrete with pumice aggregate. Gazi University Engi-neering and Architecture Journal, 3, 459-467.

TS EN 196-1 (2016). Method of testing cement-Part 1: determination of strength. Turkish Standards Institute, Ankara, Turkey.

Ulloa NA , Baykara H, Cornejo MH, Regail A, Paredes C, Villalba JL (2018). Application-oriented mix design optimization and characterization of zeo-lite-based geopolymer mortars. Construction and Building Materials, 174, 138-149.

Van Jaarsved JGS, Van Deventar JSJ, Schwartzman A (1999). The potential use of geopolymer materials to immobilize toxic metals: Part II. Material and leaching characteristics. Journal of Material Engineering, 12, 75-91.

Villa C, Pecina ET, Torres R, Gomez L (2010). Geopolymer synthesis using alkaline activation of natural zeolite. Construction and Building Materials, 24, 2084-2090.

Xie Z, Xi Y (2001). Hardening mechanisms of an alkaline activated class F fly ash. Journal of Cement and Concrete Research, 31, 1245-1249.

Zhang S, Gong K, Lu J (2004). Novel modification method for inorganic geopolymer by using water soluble organic polymer. Journal of Material Letters, 58, 1292-1296.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.