Research Articles | Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics

Influencing factors on effective width of compressed zone in joint column - cylindrical shell of steel silo

Lyubomir Zdravkov


DOI: https://doi.org/10.20528/cjsmec.2018.01.001

Abstract


In order to ensure unloading of whole amount of stored product by gravity, steel silos are often placed on supporting structure. The simplest way to design these complicated facilities is to divide cylindrical shell on two parts in our minds - discretely supported ring beam and continuously supported shell above it. Obviously, to ensure continuously support of shell, bending stiffness of ring beam should be high. In European standard EN 1993-4-1, that concept is recognized but it keeps silence about recommended stiffness of ring beam. Another way to design is to know law of distribution of compressive axial stresses due to discrete column reactions R, by height of shell. Knowing it, we could calculate the effective width leff of distribution of compressive stresses on every level. Where effective width is equal to distance between discrete supports, there critical height of shell ends and above it cylindrical body is continuously supported. Unfortunately the above quoted standard EN 1993-4-1 does not give an information how to calculate leff. The questions here are; should we accept linear distribution of compressive forces by height? In addition, could we use directly the results of Whitmore (1952), where angle of distribution α = 30°? Or, even to accept a far more brave opinion that α = 45°, used by many of the elder designers? Moreover, is value of angle α constant or does it depend on various influencing factors?


Keywords


steel silo; buckling; meridional stresses; angle of distribution; effective width

Full Text:

PDF

References


EN 1991-4:2006 (2006). Eurocode 1 - Actions on structures - Part 4: Silos and tanks, European committee for standardization, Brussels.

EN 1993-1-5:2006 (2006). Eurocode 3 - Design of steel structures - Part 1-5: Plated structural elements. European Committee for Standardi-zation, Brussels.

EN 1993-1-6:2007 (2007). Eurocode 3 - Design of steel structures - Part 1-6: Strength and Stability of Shell Structures. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.

EN 1993-4-1:2007 (2007). Eurocode 3 - Design of steel structures - Part 4-1: Silos. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.

EN 10025-2:2004 (2004). Hot rolled products of structural steels - Part 2: Technical delivery conditions for non-alloy structural steels. Eu-ropean Committee for Standardization, Brussels.

Knödel P, Ummenhofer T (1998). Ein einfaches Modell zum Stabilitäts-nachweis zylindrischer Schalentragwerke auf Einzelstützen. Stahl-bau, 67, 425-429.

Knödel P, Ummenhofer T (2009). Silos with stepped wall thickness on local supports. Proceedings of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS) Symposium, Valencia.

Rotter JM (1985). Analysis and Design of Ringbeams. Design of steel bins for storage of bulk solids, J. M. Rotter, ed., University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, 164-183.

SAP 2000 v.14.2. Structural analysis program. Computers and Structures, Inc.

Whitmore RE (1952). Experimental Investigation of Stresses in Gusset Plates. Bulletin No. 16, Engineering Experiment Station, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA.

Zdravkov LA (2017a). Some specific features of design of steel silo with capacity V = 110 m3. International Jubilee Scientific Conference "75th Anniversary of UACEG", Sofia.

Zdravkov LA (2017b). Influence of intermediate rings and height of skirt on effective width of compression zone in junction column - cylin-drical shell of steel silo. International Jubilee Scientific Conference "75th Anniversary of UACEG", Sofia.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.